-
.
Jen is upset she got the attention she wanted, but not in the way she hoped.
Her life is so good, that she is only now focusing on this being a problem, because she has nothing to really make her relatable.
She’s not kind, intelligent, interesting, or much to look at. She is alone in that echo chamber of a house with only herself as company. I would be bummed out, too.. -
.
The only worthy response to that codswallop from Jen is...
. -
.
Hey Gene, please explain on detail what “illegal privacy infringement” is. Also exactly which “words, images, and videos” have been “manipulated in harmful ways”?
I think I speak for many when I say you are not a content creator, once you started showing your cervical mucous, your poop journals, and your daily recording of Charlottes every blink, ounce of weight gain or loss, you proved to be just an attention whore. Before you think to be a scold, you need to reflect on everything you posted over all the years and ask yourself why you get so many negative comments. You posted your entire life for the Internet to see, even catching the attention of Tosh, his showing you in all your private bedroom glory, playing baby to Don’s daddy did not reign you in. All of everything is your doing, your fault, and you are solely responsible. You are not a victim, you created it all.
I do hope you get honest and let everyone know the details of the illegal infringement and harmful manipulations which you so vaguely posted about. If you can pull yourself away from your thinking of your best friend at 14 and all the vets you devote so much time to daily to explain, you may actually get more positive feedback. Meanwhile I will not hold my breath, because you never follow through with anything save over exercising, ignoring your children, shoving sweet treats down your gullet, and not understanding boundaries when it come to you EX in laws.. -
.
Maybe she’s mad because I guessed correctly that she’s never had an orgasm and didn’t realize it until she read the book?
. -
.
she bought into the mindset that she deserved stalking and illegal privacy infringement? LOL
add it to the list
thought it didn't matter if she voted, thought she wasn't supposed to enjoy sex, thought she deserved to be "stalked" for being online. just stop ✋. -
.
Jen implied suicidal ideation.
Cops or family were contacted.
It blew up in her face.
She’s big mad.
And a hearty fuck you to you, too, Bertha Gene.. -
.I'm not convinced that the invasion of privacy was anything more than the fireplace reveal.
Since she wasn’t even living there at the time it wasn’t her privacy that was invaded...and the video is on FB for all to see.. -
.
Maybe if she created actual content rather than the very intimate details of her life like mentioned above, people wouldn’t have as much to hate on. She doesn’t understand the difference between posting content and creating content. All she ever does is talk about her goddamn feelings and whine about how hard life is. Of course she’s going to get criticism. Get off the fence - either you’re rebranding and making this your job or you aren’t and it’s time to retire the page and stop attention seeking. . -
.
Shoving her crotch into our faces should be illegal. . -
.
It’s definitely about the video she abruptly took down. She either had a wellness check performed or someone contacted Don or her mother and they let her have it about the suicide allusion.
The private invasion, copyright nonsense is probably because the public story that she posted lives on elsewhere after she deleted it.. -
.
Remember Jen food is the best medicine. Lots of food. . -
.I’m dying to know what she thinks “illegal privacy infringement” means.
If it’s illegal, she needed to press charges.
Exactly. Opinions are not illegal. Gossip is not illegal. Constructive feedback is not illegal. The bakery is not illegal. People questioning is not illegal. Reposting and resharing is not illegal (whether making fun of or otherwise).
I think someone just has their fanny in a twist.. -
.
but...but... I thought she loves us? Every day. That was a LIE
My thoughts..
1. What a freaking WASTE of money with all the rebranding and new equipment. Holy hell.
2. She will be back. She needs the praise from her jenions. I think this might be a longer break.. maybe a month, but she will be back.
3. Why didn’t we think to make bingo cards while we were waiting!! I would have called “playing the victim”, “gained weight”, “blamed subscribers”, and “vague explanations”
Edited by Victoria23 - 5/20/2021, 10:23 PM. -
.Hey Gene, please explain on detail what “illegal privacy infringement” is. Also exactly which “words, images, and videos” have been “manipulated in harmful ways”?
I think it was ColdOne's picture of DatAss in actual size.
. -
.
Agree, I was too lazy to go find it….