Sugar Coma
Sugar Coma
- Group
- Member
- Posts
- 835
- Reputation
- +17,311
- Location
- living my best life with my upgrade wife
- Status
- Offline
|
|
I think the (unexpected) extra time at Christmas and the increased parenting time this Winter are two separate "events".
Speaking from my own experience with my stepdaughter:
1. When she was younger, we were doing 2-2-5-5 and splitting holidays into Christmas Eve to 12pm Christmas Day alternating years. That was awful, leaving neither parent able to travel and see family for Christmas (both grandparents live out of state) and leaving my stepdaughter unable to relax and enjoy any holiday because she always had a "bag packed" and waiting to be picked up or dropped off - we could tell it wasn't best for her. When she started school (around Donny's age) we proposed the week-on-week-off schedule and at the same time asked for alternate years to combine Christmas Eve and Christmas Day for an uninterrupted Christmas vacation. Mom fought this tooth and nail, so to get mom to agree we offered her the first year of having both Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Something like this is a possibility.
2. Particularly during the pandemic, but really whenever we knew mom had a big vacation trip planned had myself or my husband been sick, we would have communicated that if it compromised my stepdaughter's ability to travel or take a big/important trip. It's just a decent co-parenting thing to do. While I don't expect Jen to have been this considerate towards the other household, I believe them to be decent humans who wouldn't want CC and Donny to miss a cruise they might be excited about. With multiple kids in the household and this time of year, it is not a stretch to think someone in the house could be sick. This wouldn't usually matter as much and you might take a chance, but with a big trip days after Christmas, they could be extra careful as the right move for the kids. Something like this is a possibility.
3. It's possible that Jen and Don's agreement has a "first right of refusal" kind of clause. So, if Don is having some kind of surgery/procedure and is temporarily unavailable but someone like his wife, his mom/dad, or a nanny ARE available to provide care, Jen might be able to say, "absolutely not" and exercise that right to be the primary caretaker. While this seems less likely, she could be doing this as a punishment to Don.
4. It is possible that Jen herself has little to no true knowledge of the situation. We lost a baby at 22 weeks right around the Christmas holidays ten years ago. It was devastating. It was especially devastating to text my stepdaughter's mom (who constantly gloated that I wasn't a "real" mom) from the maternity triage that we had an emergency, and could she please pick her up from school and keep her a couple of extra days ending up with unexpected Christmas Eve AND Christmas Day. We were a total wreck and in our deepest grief, we didn't want to subject my stepdaughter to it and ruin her Christmas. It sucked not seeing her, and it sucked to give her mom extra days when it was such a contentious situation, but it was the best thing for the kid. If there was some kind of expected or unexpected family tragedy, accident, or the like it is possible that D+T did the right thing and asked their respective co-parents to take the kids temporarily while they sorted things out. Again, I am hoping something awful and unexpected is not the case, but if it is, the right thing as a parent might be to keep the kids somewhere stable (if you have access to an alternate care scenario like a co-parent) while you land on your feet. I believe D+T to be the kind of parents who would put the kids first and do the right thing.
|
|