-
|
.
|
| Such a spiteful thing to do to her child.
I know we are a broken record on this but these kids will need so much therapy to be able to function as adults. Growing up with a mother like Jen will no doubt do so much damage. |
|
-
|
.
|
|  epic fail indeed, Marnie!
You know she will be finding sand on her for the next month since she doesn’t shower regularly. |
|
-
|
.
|
| | Jen for sure pushes the stuffies because she thinks her kids are weaklings like her. But let’s take the scenario that the kids actually want them. Did it ever cross Jen’s mind that maybe the kids need their emotional support stuffies because being around their mother causes them too much anxiety? |
|
-
|
.
|
| Charlotte’s face says ‘I’m so over this shit’. That kid never looks happy around her mother and who can blame her?
The panic on Jen’s face when she realised there’s no sweets around! She looked like a starving wild animal looking for food in desperation. A sugar addict if I ever saw one. |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (MysteryMeat @ 31/8/2023, 00:06) Did anyone else catch her saying that they (HB and her majesty) will be going on vacation in a few weeks? She also added "out of the country". Norway again? How many new suitcases and tech gear bags will she be linking this time? 
Perhaps she’s going back to Paris to be rejected by the Hermes SAs again.  |
|
-
|
.
|
| | She thinks this is a tonal look. KB, that’s not tonal, that’s just shit. |
|
-
|
.
|
| Maybe she’s quiet because the divorce bells are too loud.  |
|
-
|
.
|
| Their relationship is so dysfunctional, it makes me so uncomfortable.
She has zero say in anything in her life, from making money to where she goes on holiday and everything in between. The constant need to praise her husband for every little thing is so bizarre. She is over effusive about him encouraging her to keep going, when she felt tired from the climb. I mean, in my world, that is normal, as is in most healthy couples’ relationships.
Imagine thinking your partner is some amazing human for not leaving you by the side of the mountain or telling you to sod off for being tired. It really shows how she is conditioned to think these little, normal things couples do for each other, are actually huge acts of generosity on Michael’s part. |
|
-
|
.
|
| For her to admit she was grumpy and pissy, it means she was a raging tornado of anger.
Michael the superhero cheered her on.  If husband of the year had asked you what kind of holiday you wanted to go on, and you worked together to decide where you are going, you wouldn’t be surprised that you ended up having to climb a steep mountain. You codependent moron! |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (adivinadivina @ 29/8/2023, 01:59) QUOTE (pinkumbrella @ 29/8/2023, 01:09) i don’t think it’s quite that simple and the truth is, many in the UK adore the monarchy. you’d never get enough people to fully overturn it. what people don’t understand is that a select few of privileged buffoons are living the life of riley thanks to the poor who pay their taxes. i’d be incensed if i was stuck in a shitty rental with a shitty car, knowing my taxes were contributing to the palaces and range rover lifestyle of a few select “royals”. it’s a joke.
also it’s not the same thing - your president actually has constitutional and legal powers afforded to her/him. she/he can declare a war. they command an entire military and can pass legislation (not single-handedly of course) - charles just wears a crown and lopes around his country estate. the prime minister is the one who actually runs the country - they’re the commonwealth’s equivalent to a president. charles is ceremonial and nothing more. Well its the same where i live we pay literally half of my husband income on taxes for this state yet nothing gets done yet the politicians get rich. Each country has its draw backs to what our taxes are contributing. I dont however think bashing the royal family will negate what H&M are doing which is just straight up toxic, the least we can say its also toxic what they are doing. Specially Meghan jezz that women its the worst to me. They could have just done what they said they were going to do in the first place but nop they did the opposite of that.
Comparing politicians to the RF is not comparing apples to apples. Politicians can be voted out, we cannot vote the RF out. They are there by birthright and in a modern society that is ridiculous. Just like the US, in the UK we still pay a lot of taxes and the politicians get nothing done. However, we pay that on top of paying the RF. It’s like we are being taxed twice yet the country is in disarray.
Charles is one of the richest people in the world but we had to pay millions as taxpayers for the coronation, during a crippling cost of living crisis. Charles, as a British citizen, didn’t have to pay tax (40%) on the inheritance the Queen left him. Buckingham Palace is owned by the monarch of the moment (one of the richest people in the world) but we, the tax payers, have to pay for the upkeep. All this while people have to live in squalor because rents are so high or libraries are shutting down because local Governments can’t afford to keep them.
Charles has agreed to pay income tax, following in his mother’s footsteps. Myself and many others find the fact that they are given a choice, absurd and insulting. Their income comes from us the tax payers.
I don’t disagree that H&M have been and still are absolute brats. However, I disagree that the RF have been honourable and quiet about it all. They use the press to say what they won’t say with their own mouths.
As this is the Royal Families thread, I am glad we can have a civilised debate about that, rather than the usual one sided H&M bashing and OTT RF adoration.
Edited by zizizouzou - 29/8/2023, 07:09 |
|
-
|
.
|
| | She really has no shame calling that piss poor attempt at content, a job. |
|
-
|
.
|
| Everything is awful but what the actual F is this look? My eyes hurt!
 |
|
-
|
.
|
| We are simply watching a dysfunctional family have at it. It’s just weird that so many people show such blind loyalty to either side.
As taxpayers, we pay for this expensive and unnecessary show while children starve in the UK. The truth is, they are all horrible and most importantly unnecessary. We can live just fine without every single one of them but they all need the public and our money, in order to exist. |
|
-
|
.
|
| I don’t hold a candle for anyone associated with the RF, certainly not for H&M or W&C, or Charles and Camilla. The RF are a highly dysfunctional family.
I agree that H&M deploy expensive PR companies but nothing is a match for the PR and control the RF has.
Nothing gets fed to the press unless the Firm wants it to. Even on rare occasions when things get leaked, they are quickly hushed and then never spoken about again. All RFs are powerful when it comes to carefully controlling the narrative but the British RF is one of the most powerful in that regard. The Prince Andrew situation is a perfect example of that.
Anyone thinking H&M are feeding PR narratives but W&C or Charles and Camilla don’t, are deluding themselves. They all play the same game.
This thread certainly has a strong bias against H&M and massive love for W&C and C&C. It is what it is. |
|
-
|
.
|
| | Farting her life and Don’s money away like Jen. |
|
18444 replies since 1/8/2016
.
