-
|
.
|
| So do we think she’s heavily monitoring comments on today’s video?
It’s 15 minutes live and nothing delightful yet in the comment section. |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (ample hips @ 4/1/2024, 16:41) Does anyone think Paula could actually be Jen in disguise? She sure seems to say a lot of things we all know Jen would LOVE to say, the thinly veiled venom, overly verbose explanations?
When Jen herself responds she is very bidness wady-wike and thinly veiled anger. She does attempt to pretend she's professional however. The lag between Paula starting to respond and Jen being on vacation tracks. It just seriously feels to me like Jen is jenfending under another profile.
That's my conspiracy theory for the month 😆
I mean, Jen absolutely has multiple Instagram accounts. I blocked her for a while (during her Winnie-abuse season) and when you look at the accounts you’ve blocked you can see either one profile bubble, or two (never more than two, even if there are 3+ accounts). She has two. Of course, she likely has a private account… but it wouldn’t surprise me even slightly if she were sockpuppeting as her biggest fan as a means to have a rage outlet.
I don’t think she’s Paula (because Paula seems to exist on every platform), but I wouldn’t doubt that Jen herself pretends to be one of the people who Jenfends. |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (PowderRoomCandy @ 4/1/2024, 03:58) Isn't there already a user named TastyTreats?
And for the millionth time, there is another D** Ross out there. There has been confusion about this in the past. Trust, the old dirt has been dug up and reburied long ago.
Pfft. No confusion here. Jen’s formerly special boy CLEARLY died in 2018 after an illustrious career producing Muder, She Wrote.
Case closed, bakers.
 |
|
-
|
.
|
| | Her little change is exactly why I immediately posted the screenshot yesterday. She always does this and would have gaslit her audience had there been no proof. “I didn’t say that, you must be confused… peace be with you.” |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (Millennium Falcom @ 3/1/2024, 19:54) This is a stupid question. But for real single mothers who want to show to their kids the magic of Santa.... wouldn't you just fill your stocking with stuff you already have or would buy anyway? Like I'm at the checkout getting groceries for dinner, lemme throw in this Hersey bar. Oh I have this shampoo under the sink, add that.
If I were single I would definitely fill my own stocking… but with useful things and/or things I’d wanted for ages and hadn’t felt I should splurge on. So it definitely wouldn’t get “forgotten”.
Jen probably bought six of everything in her stocking so she just hasn’t had to take out of the actual sock yet. I’m sure her nightstand is full of crumpled Godiva Bear wrappers. |
|
-
|
.
|
| So she passive-aggressively waited for her 8 year old to notice that she didn’t open her stocking (assumably so she could pull the “busy single mama” card). That poor kid definitely got the “well, I’m soooo busy having to take care of you two kids all by myself  “ act from Mommy Dearest.
She stuffed it herself, she absolutely didn’t forget about it lol
How relatable. |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (Oatley @ 3/1/2024, 13:38) QUOTE (Oatley @ 3/1/2024, 13:12) Yea they are feral. The lovies, the fear of chocolate smearing on furniture, still needing a noise machine to sleep at 8 and 5, needing to put sticky note over toilets to prevent flushing noise, all indicates stalled development. The trauma of divorce and an unloving mother probably stalled their development to the point they are still toddlers in their brain. Someone here wrote probably Jen is keeping her kids so that they can act as caregiver post her foot surgery 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣such theories I tell you! Care giving by kids who still need sound machine to sleep and carry lovies. Jen ruined those kids just like she herself remained stalled at 5 years old. We only see posed photos at RM3, mostly taken by professional photographer, where may be for that moment lovies are taken away. Jen does not care about image of her kids, so she does not take lovies away for photographs or candid shots. I do not believe they don't carry lovies at RM3 but start carrrying them as soon as they are with Jen. If they stop carrying, they would stop everywhere. Jen can't manage or control her kids not to destroy furniture or go feral publicly, so I refuse to believe she can control them to make them forcibly carry lovies. I totally agree and believe that rather than trying to wean them off, Jen actually ENCOURAGES them to carry lovies, by saying "who told you big girls can't carry lovies? You can carry lovie at any age. See mommy still carries Jasper. You can wear micky ear publicly at any age. ". BUT, it's not just a question of not encouraging. A girl of CC's age also starts getting influenced by peers. At her age, I would be MORTIFIED to be photographed with a lovie. NOBODY could have made me caught with a baby's toy like that. I was already reading storybooks/novels at that age... much more responsible and grown up than these kids appear to be. Nobody is addressing their NEED to still carry a lovie. They themselves have to refuse to carry it and the fact they are still clinging onto it, indicates to me some sort of trauma.
 |
|
-
|
.
|
| I just don’t understand why she wouldn’t have said the obvious: “…which helps to facilitate my travel content”. Sure, it still would have been a lie, but it wouldn’t have been fucking offensive and idiotic.
I get it, it’s an idiom… but idioms can be used at completely inappropriate times and this is a perfect example of that. She’s said and done a LOT of shitty things, but I genuinely think this will have a massive negative impact and it’s ✨magic✨ |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (Meow2 @ 3/1/2024, 02:56) QUOTE (OstracizedLikeJen @ 2/1/2024, 15:08) I’m on the “Don has decided to blast himself into space rather than deal with another second of Jennifer” train. this is my favorite theory so far 
 |
|
-
|
.
|
| Just looked at Youtube and Paula found her way to the comment section. Keep in mind that it’s a several-days-old video, and Paula is always first on the scene (so she definitely saw the video on the day it premiered).
So, basically, either dear Paula either saw the Instagram post and RECOGNIZES that it was heinous enough for people to take to YouTube to comment… OR she gets her rocks off hanging around the bakery and saw that folks were commenting on YouTube and headed over. It’s far too coincidental that she just happened to visit the comment section on an old video that we’re all talking about.
Hi, Paula, you sassy ol’ twat! Don’t be shy!🎵One of us One of us🎵 You know full-well that Jen’s being a dink, so why so desperate to coddle her? It’s giving Gretchen Weiners, honestly (“ The meaner Regina was to her, the more Gretchen tried to win Regina back”).
Edited by OstracizedLikeJen - 3/1/2024, 02:54 |
|
-
|
.
|
| The comments on YouTube are really stacking up.
Here comes the ‘ol withholdy-scoldy. |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (Blue-tah Trunk Celery @ 2/1/2024, 21:02) Maybe not donating $2500 to someone's dog's surgery would help keep the lights on.
Doesn’t count because she took that money directly from her own dying dog’s care. ✨girl math✨ |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (Dairy Free no more @ 2/1/2024, 20:34) She wastes more money in a month than some families spend in a year. She really is awful. She should be ashamed for posting "keeping the lights on." 
She routinely spends, on frivolous junk, an average family’s monthly mortgage payment in a day. She could have paid for a struggling family’s rent and utilities for a month with what she spent on advent calendars alone. That would have been an incredible Christmas act of kindness (from the idiot who cried over giving away a broken tree).
It’s wild that she has this ability to use her privilege to be an awesome person, but she actively chooses to be heinous. |
|
-
|
.
|
| QUOTE (WhereDoesDaddySleep @ 2/1/2024, 20:24) QUOTE (WhiteChristmasIsMyFavoriteMovie @ 1/2/2024, 03:09 PM) Does anyone have the pic of Jen in her red crowned athletic outfit?? This one? 
The scream I scrumpt after I choked on my pauper’s $0.50 chai latte. |
|
-
|
.
|
| In light of her “keeping the lights on” comment, let’s all toss out random numbers related to her frivolous spending.
I’ll go first. 29029:
“ The all-inclusive registration fees for 2023 events ranged from $4,995-$5,995 ”. Note: this does not include travel costs. |
|
2399 replies since 1/3/2018
.
